Clinical Efficacy-Use of Sequential Compression Devices (SCD’s) in Addition to Pharmacologic Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis (see Sequential Compression Device)
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Use of Sequential Compression Devices (SCD’s) in Addition to Pharmacologic Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Adults (Crit Care Explor, 2022) [MEDLINE]: n = 8,796 (17 trials)
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device was Mostly Applied Tp to the Thigh and Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Consisted of Primarily Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin
Adjunctive Intermittent Pneumatic Compression was Associated with a Decreased Risk of Venous Thromboembolism (15 Trials, RR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.35-0.81]) and Deep Venous Thrmbosis (14 Trials, RR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.33-0.81), But Not Pulmonary Embolism (7 Trials, RR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.32-1.68)
The Quality of Evidence was Graded as Low, Downgraded by Risk of Bias and Inconsistency
Moderate and Very Low Quality Evidence Respectively, Suggests that Adjunctive Intermittent Pneumatic Compression is Unlikely to Change the Risk of All-Cause Mortality or Adverse Events
Subgroup Analyses Indicate a More Evident Apparent Benefit in Industry-Funded Trials
Adverse Effects/Complications
XXXX
xxxxx
References
Indications
Effect of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Addition to Pharmacologic Prophylaxis for Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Explor. 2022 Oct 3;4(10):e0769. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000769. eCollection 2022 Oct [MEDLINE]